Federal Court Litigation
At Dyer Immigration Law, we understand that sometimes legal challenges in the immigration process extend beyond the administrative level. When individuals face unlawful detention, disagree with decisions made by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), or experience unwarranted adjudication delays at United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), federal court litigation can provide a critical avenue for relief. We are committed to advocating for our clients in U.S. District Courts and U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, ensuring that their rights are protected and their voices are heard.
Habeas Corpus Petitions in Immigration Detention
In some cases, individuals may be detained by U.S. immigration authorities for extended periods, often without a clear resolution of their immigration status. When this happens, we may file a habeas corpus petition in the U.S. District Court to challenge the legality of the detention.
A habeas corpus petition is a powerful tool that can be used to secure the release of individuals who are unlawfully detained in immigration custody. If a client has been detained for an unreasonable length of time without a bond hearing or a resolution to their case, we work tirelessly to seek their release through this legal remedy. The U.S. District Court will review whether the detention is consistent with the law and, in some cases, may order the individual’s release from detention pending further immigration proceedings.
Our experienced legal team handles all aspects of habeas corpus petitions, including:
- Reviewing the facts of the case to determine the grounds for challenging detention
- Filing petitions in the appropriate U.S. District Court
- Representing clients in court hearings related to their detention
- Advocating for the release of clients when detention is found to be unlawful
Petitions for Review of BIA Decisions
When an immigration case is decided by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and an individual disagrees with the outcome, they may seek to appeal the decision to a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals by filing a petition for review .
Petitions for review are filed when there is a belief that the BIA made a legal error in their decision, such as misinterpreting the law or making a decision that is not supported by the evidence. By filing a petition for review, we request that the appropriate U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals examine the BIA's decision and potentially overturn or remand the case for further proceedings.
Our attorneys have extensive experience in handling petitions for review, which include:
- Reviewing the BIA's decision to identify legal errors
- Drafting persuasive arguments to present to the Circuit Court
- Filing the petition within strict deadlines
- Representing clients at hearings in the Circuit Court, if necessary
- Fighting for the client’s interests in cases involving deportation, asylum, and other immigration matters
Writs of Mandamus for Unreasonable USCIS Adjudication Delays
In today’s immigration system, delays have become increasingly common. Many applicants wait months — and sometimes years — for USCIS to adjudicate applications for adjustment of status, naturalization, employment authorization, immigrant visas, asylum, or other immigration benefits. When those delays become unreasonable, federal court litigation may be an appropriate and powerful remedy.
A writ of mandamus is a federal lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court asking a judge to compel a government agency to perform its legal duty — in this context, to make a decision on a properly filed immigration application.
Mandamus litigation does not ask the court to approve your case. Instead, it asks the court to require USCIS to take action and issue a decision.
When Is a Mandamus Petition Appropriate?
Federal law requires government agencies to adjudicate cases within a reasonable time. While some delay is expected, prolonged inaction without justification may violate that obligation.
A mandamus petition may be appropriate when:
- Your case has been pending far beyond normal processing times
- Repeated service requests have failed to produce meaningful updates
- The delay is causing significant personal, professional, or financial harm
- USCIS has provided no clear explanation for continued inaction
Each case must be evaluated individually, and not every delay qualifies as “unreasonable.” Our firm carefully analyzes the facts, processing trends, and legal standards before recommending federal court intervention.
Our attorneys have a successful track record of handling mandamus actions, which include:
- Evaluating the length and nature of the delay
- Evaluating processing patterns in similar cases
- Considering potential risks
- Formulating appropriate case strategies
- Filing writs in the appropriate U.S. District Court
- Advocating aggressively to compel agency action
If appropriate, we file suit in the proper U.S. District Court and advocate aggressively to compel agency action.
Securing the best possible outcome
Whether you are facing an unjust detention, disagree with a BIA decision, or are frustrated with unwarranted adjudication delays at USCIS, we are here to guide you through the complex process of federal court litigation. Our goal is always to secure the best possible outcome for our clients, utilizing every available legal avenue to protect their rights.
Dedicated to helping our clients
At Dyer Immigration Law Group, P.C., our attorneys and staff are dedicated to helping our clients successfully navigate the employment-based immigration process to meet their business and immigration needs. We speak:
Languages We Speak
- English
- Spanish
- Portuguese
- French
- Hebrew
- Urdu
- Balochi
- Hindi